Thursday, June 9, 2011

Clouds Eventually Burst

So often lately, I hear of the cloud and the wonderful things it will do for the world. I increasingly hear that any software effort that is not directed toward the cloud is going to fail. So much, I hear that desktops and laptops are antiquated due to the superiority of cloud-utilizing dumb terminals. I completely disagree, and should the cloud be the true future of computing, I think I may just have to find a new interest.

For me, the cloud is one big mistake. I do not want others to be in charge of my data. I do not want to put my data on a server run by a company whose fine print tells me that the company is not responsible for my data, or worse that the company owns my data. As Google has shown us, the servers that make up this "cloud" are computers like any other. Bad things can and do happen. In a perfect world, massive levels of redundancy would exist for every computer on Earth, but this isn't a perfect world. This world is one where mistakes are made.

The biggest issue that I have with this cloud model we are seeing is the lack of control that people are getting as concerns the systems that fully utilize it. For example, our smart phones give us little to no control. iPhones have to be jailbroken if their users wish to install non-Apple sanctioned software. Android phones have to be "rooted" which can be a simple task or a difficult task depending upon the device's manufacturer. Windows 7 phones have to be jailbroken as well, considering that they are following Apple's "walled garden" approach. The Google Chrome OS tablet/netbook things are apparently just as bad as these smart phones, and iPads are as well. WebOS was traditionally a little more open for tinkerers, but not to the extent that our traditional desktops and laptops were.

People may regard this as a first-world problem that concerns only the wealthy elite, but I would beg to differ. I didn't learn the majority of what I know from university (although university did help). I learned most of what I know from tinkering and experimenting with "open" machines. I learned through a process of trial and error with relatively inexpensive equipment that allowed me to try an endless number of possibilities. I was able to find out for myself what worked and didn't. In this new world of "closed" and "cloud-based" devices no future generation will have the same advantage. University will no longer be a privilege for those curious individuals who happen to be wealthy, but will instead be a requirement for all people seeking to enter the IT community.

Further, I would argue that the "cloud-based" and the web-centric nature of the current IT community punishes those who live in areas where web access is limited. I live in a rather rural area of Georgia (SE, US), and I am consequently stuck on a relatively slow DSL connection. For those who live closer to Atlanta, getting a high speed connection is rather easy. For me, it's nearly impossible. America is a wealthy nation with a lot of offerings. One would imagine that offerings in less developed nations would be scarce as hens' teeth. Yet, we continue down this path, and alienate a good portion of the human population.

Some cloud initiatives are less abominable, but still awful. For example, cloud-based data backup is somewhat useless for an individual. While it's a nice thought that any person could get off-site backup for the low price of $60/year, it's still not that good a deal. Should your machine fail, you now have to spend hours restoring your data. Nothing will beat a good external hard disc drive in that realm.

I almost feel as though we are taking a step backward. The network may be much larger, and it may be rather pervasive as well, but I feel like we are willingly giving up our freedom, and enslaving our digital world to the hands of massive, multinational corporations that couldn't care less about our computing experience. Somehow, I am supposed to think that this is the best turn the computing industry has ever taken. Somehow, I am supposed to think that this is true innovation, and not greed and lust for control. Somehow, I am supposed to think that I am being liberated by having zero control over my data. Somehow, I am supposed to think that being completely nerfed in my ability to change the computing device that I depend on is an improvement over being able to completely alter my hardware and software stack in any way(s) I see fit. Sorry, but for me the cloud has already come and burst.

13 comments:

  1. I have to agree with you on this and I find those of us with this view are somehow being made to look ignorant of computing and the cloud. I don't know for anyone else but there is no cloud computing - clouds still do what they do and computers still do what they do. And, just like you, I like when my computer does what I want it to do.

    I am not really surprised though, that so many people are in a hurry to give up their digital freedom. Many, many people are not interested in freedom as long as they are comfortable and accepted as part of the crowd. Then they become evangelists against those who don't subscribe to that view. This is what most of the gravest atrocities against mankind are built on. I'm prepared to let them have their cloud but they are not prepared to allow me to have my own computer. Go figure!

    ReplyDelete
  2. @2GNEC,
    Well said. I am considering making this blog a "non-cloud in cloud world blog" when the cloud becomes the standard.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I thoroughly agree. Thank you for eloquently and completely expressing how I feel about "The Cloud."

    ReplyDelete
  4. @18937d46-3722-11e0-9f21-000bcdcb2996, thx 2 u as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Speaking the truth does not always cloud issues.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "I do not want others to be in charge of my data.

    Nothing will beat a good external hard disc drive in that realm."

    Yep. Most of the articles I see extolling the virtues of this mythical "cloud" dwell on the positive aspects of software as a service. A service THEY can charge for, of course. But, they almost never mention the fact that you are entrusting personal data to unknown entities. And that data can be, and often is, spectacularly compromised.

    "Many, many people are not interested in freedom as long as they are comfortable and accepted as part of the crowd. Then they become evangelists against those who don't subscribe to that view."

    That pretty much sums it up for probably two-thirds of humanity. The need to belong or the herd instinct runs deep in human psyche.

    The so-called cloud is actually nothing new, in computing terms. It's the old client/server paradigm of dumb terminals and mainframes. It was also Sun's original vision of how java would "revolutionize" personal computing. I remember a video of Jonathan Schwartz mimicking carrying around a 100 pound personal computer because it "would have to be that big to store all the data".

    So, the "cloud" is an old concept with a new name and new market-speak.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Don't get me wrong as cloud services may or may not be good, but when it comes down to it people are blind, and idiots when it comes to modern tech. I have no problem telling someone that I think it's a bad idea, and for the most part I think that could services are bad for the end user. I believe in freedom, and to do what I want to do with my system.

    I was a ChromeOS beta tester, and they have made some major improvements, but I don't like the idea of having everything stored online. I saw it fit to put a full featured OS on my CR-48. It runs Linux very well, and I'm not complaining now.

    I think that everyone should have an external drive, or NAS. I also think that it's needs to be easy to use, and simple to setup. One other plus of having at home storage is security. Oh and don't forget when you don't have to deal with online providers you cut out the middleman to you data.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We are taking a step backwards. It's like a PAT with less options. Who wants that? PAT's can be neat in a pinch, but I don't think we need to return to that model.

    I feel that the cloud thing should be an option, but I agree that it shouldn't be the only option.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Shillelagh,
    What do you mean by PAT? Do you mean PAS? Personal Application Server? In that case, they are almost nothing alike. The PAS was essentially a thin client system. Cloud applications are websites. HTTP/HTML are not application development technologies and we are trying to use them that way, which only serves to make the delivered product less than desirable. That is also if we are completely ignoring the loss of control that an individual faces when moving to these technologies. I don't deny some of the benefits, but personally I feel that the detriments outweigh them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have to agree with you on this post. The cloud is a myth people are buying into. But the reality is more and more people use technology products could care less how it works. The just want to see the results. And that is to me a dangerous path society is moving in. Sure there will still be the groups like us but as more and more products are released and the price points hit those magic numbers, people jump in feet first without a clue as to what they are agreeing to when they click accept.

    I have to admit I say all this and I have a Dropbox account, the Box.net and today I used Amazon to get a free song. But I use them sparingly and mostly for transfers to other systems. Would I entrust my personal data to any of them? Not a chance. I too like to know I control that data and where it goes.

    Well written post as usual. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @JRaz, again I must thank you for making me feel that I am providing a worth while service to the community.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, this was a wonderful post, a ray of light in these dark and "cloudy" days.

    ReplyDelete